Where else would you get your leftist bearings every week?
Volume III, Number 11: 23 March 2003
I have President Bush, and his compassionate conservatism, to thank for the following revelations.
God loves America. America's interest equals justice.
The world should love America and fear America. America is all-powerful. The people and countries of the world must submit to America's will or risk America's wrath.
The full-fledged war against Iraq has finally begun. Hundreds of thousands of Americans have rightly joined millions of citizens worldwide in protesting the morality and legality of the actions of the Bush administration. Bolstering their numbers are majorities in European polls and substantial minorities in American polls that share their displeasure. Even in America, many self-described supporters of the war are nonetheless uneasy with the zeal for war that George Bush and his administration have shown.
So many aspects of the war in Iraq could redound poorly for the United States, for Iraq and its neighbors, or for peace in general. But Iraq could be just one aspect of a wider struggle. Important men who advise the Bush administration from both within and without see the war against Iraq as just the first installment of a number of battles. Their vision is more consistent with the empires of yore, empires now rued in the history books, than with the promise of democracy. The anti-war movement must ensure that Iraq does not become the new paradigm for American foreign policy.
[Click on a title to read a particular article.]
The old adage about politics making strange bedfellows hit me twice last week as I snuggled up under the covers with both Pat Buchanan and Billy Bulger. I did not seek out these relationships, but I woke up in them. Despite the discomfort that these relationships instill in me, I won't be taking any political walks of shame. A broken clock is right twice a day, and Pat Buchanan and Billy Bulger were right last week in their public statements. Buchanan was right when he exposed the "War Party" in the Bush administration, its exploitation of 9/11, and its failed policies. Bulger was right when he defended the University of Massachusetts against elitism and budget cuts.
Tonight, President Bush made a televised address outlining the rationale for starting a full-scale war on Iraq. Anyone worried about any deviation from form can relax. In his address, Bush fell back upon his old mainstays of cant, obfuscation, and lies.
[Click on a title to read a particular article.]
Almost two hundred articles from previous weeks are in our archives. If you're not careful, you might learn something.
If you like, sign up for our mailing list to get an update in your mailbox when we update this site, generally once per week. It's guaranteed to be more fun than spam.
All of our original material—almost everything on the bear-left.com website— is now subject to a license from Creative Commons. It lets anyone copy or distribute our work for noncommercial purposes, with certain restrictions. In other words, copy but don't steal. Click on the Creative Commons logo on our of our pages for more information, including other types of licenses that are available.
On 18 March 2003, the British House of Commons debated for ten hours the proposition that military action against Iraq was necessary. On the same day, the United States House and Senate spent no time debating that question. In the Senate, the impending war was only mentioned in passing during a leisurely debate on next year's budget. Meanwhile, the Senate managed to take time to praise the University of Vermont men's basketball team.
In the House, Iraq was the immediate subject of three one-minute speeches soon after the beginning of the day at 12:30 p.m. and three five-minute speeches in the evening after most members had left town. Much of the actual debate for the day concerned the proposition that stoning people to death was bad (House Concurrent Resolution 26).
Sources:
Hansard Debates texts, 18 March 2003;
Congressional Record,
House of Representatives, 18 March 2003;
Congressional Record,
Senate, 18 March 2003.